ARABBITHOLE
Topics
Government programmes5Deaths and disappearances10Space7Ancient sites5Natural mysteries5Unsolved mysteries6Myths and legends6Origins5Sport5
Cases/Ancient sites/Case 052
Case · The Nazca Lines

Did aliens have a hand in the Nazca Lines?

The answer so far
People of the Nasca era made them

Pottery on the lines and the 2024 survey tie them to people who made and walked them from at least the 1st century BCE. The landing-strip claim has no support in any record read; what the lines were for is still argued.

  • ✓ Confirmed1st century BCEPeople on the Nazca Pampa start making geoglyphs by the 1st century BCE
  • ✓ Confirmed23 Sep 2024The PNAS survey paper says the two kinds of figures served different purposes
  • UnverifiedTheoryThe lines were meant as landing strips or signals for visitors from space
  • DisputedTheoryThe lines were laid out as an astronomical calendar

Giant lines and figures scraped into the desert of southern Peru. Archaeologists date them to the Nasca era; a 1968 bestseller called the plain an airfield, and in 2024 an AI-guided survey nearly doubled the known figures.

The question Who made the Nazca Lines, how old are they, and what were they for?

11 main-timeline steps3 branches19 sources, 4 of them tier 1
The short version

What the records say

The documented story holds up: 11 of 11 timeline steps are Confirmed by the records (score 100).

3 theories checked: 2 unverified, 1 disputed. A theory is rated by its key claim.

The theories, and how they hold up
Most recent finding
23 Sep 2024

The PNAS survey paper says the two kinds of figures served different purposes

confirmed

Confirmed as a record of what this document says, not that it is true. See the step

Down the rabbit hole

The ground line is the documented timeline. Each tunnel is a theory that branches off it; every chamber is a step, coloured by how well the records support it. The deepest chamber is the theory’s key claim. Tap one to open it.

11 documented steps along the ground; 3 theories tunnel down from them. Landing strips for visitors from space: Unverified. A calendar in the desert: Disputed. The three-fingered “Nazca mummies”: Unverified.1st century BCE1941 onward1968Jun 2017Sep 2024A calendar in the desertDisputedLanding strips for visitors from spaceUnverifiedThe three-fingered “Nazca mummies”Unverified
confirmedlikelydisputedunverifieddisproven

Main timeline

Oldest first
confirmedlikelydisputedunverifieddisproven
  1. 1st century BCE
    confirmed

    People on the Nazca Pampa start making geoglyphs by the 1st century BCE

    Pottery found on and near the lines shows their use began by at least the 1st century BCE, in the Initial Nasca period (100 BCE to 50 CE), and went on until the 15th century CE. They were made by removing the weathered surface gravel to reveal the lighter ground beneath.

    T1Sakai et al., PNAS, 23 Sep 2024Introduction: Dating of Nazca GeoglyphsT1UNESCO World Heritage listingStatement of Outstanding Universal Value: authenticity
    Sources disagreeUNESCO’s short description dates the lines to between 500 B.C. and A.D. 500; its longer statement says the 8th century BC to the 8th century AD; the 2024 survey dates the start to at least the 1st century BCE.
  2. 50–300 CE
    confirmed

    Early Nasca pottery turns up at the giant figures

    Pottery from the Early Nasca period (50 to 300 CE) was found at the large line-drawn figures such as the “whale” and the “monkey”, so some of them were in use by then. Their style matches Nasca pottery designs.

    T1Sakai et al., PNAS, 23 Sep 2024Introduction: Dating of Nazca Geoglyphs
  3. Early 20th century
    confirmed

    The lines are rediscovered

    The 2024 survey paper says the lines were rediscovered in the early 20th century. Among the first reports it cites is one by T. Mejía Xesspe, given at a congress in Lima in 1939.

    T1Sakai et al., PNAS, 23 Sep 2024Introduction, refs. 1–2
  4. 1941 onward
    confirmed

    Maria Reiche and others begin decades of study and protection

    UNESCO’s listing says that since 1941 foreign scientists, notably Dr Maria Reiche, and Peru’s Ministry of Culture have studied, conserved and protected the lines.

    T1UNESCO World Heritage listingProtection and management requirements
  5. 1968
    confirmed

    Erich von Däniken’s book says the plain looked like an airfield

    In “Chariots of the Gods?” he wrote that seen from the air the plain “made on me was that of an airfield!” and asked whether the lines told the “gods”: “Land here!” He also wrote that it was “not yet possible to say with certainty”.

  6. 1994
    confirmed

    UNESCO makes the lines a World Heritage site

    The Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa were inscribed in 1994. UNESCO says they cover about 450 square kilometres, some 400 km south of Lima.

    T1UNESCO World Heritage listingDate of Inscription; brief description
  7. 20 Jun 2017
    confirmed

    Gaia’s video presents three-fingered “mummies” said to be from Nazca

    The streaming company’s special report says researchers began studying six three-fingered mummies found in Nazca in spring 2017, and that the largest was carbon dated to roughly 1,700 years.

  8. 15 Nov 2019
    confirmed

    Yamagata University announces 143 new geoglyphs, one of them found by AI

    Professor Masato Sakai’s team found 142 by fieldwork and 3D data up to 2018. A 2018–2019 study with IBM Japan found one more with an AI model, the first at the site found that way.

  9. Sep 2022 – Feb 2023
    confirmed

    An AI-guided field survey confirms 303 new figurative geoglyphs

    An AI model trained on a few hundred known figures proposed 47,410 candidate spots; archaeologists ranked 1,309 and checked them on foot with Peru’s permission, in 1,440 labour hours. Before this, 430 figurative geoglyphs were known.

  10. 12 Sep 2023
    confirmed

    Jaime Maussan shows two small bodies to Mexico’s Congress

    The journalist and self-described ufologist told lawmakers the bodies were not part of the evolution of our world. Euronews reports he testified under oath and that his claims have not been scientifically proven.

    Sources disagreeCBS News says Maussan claimed the bodies were recovered near Peru’s Nazca Lines; Euronews says they were retrieved from Cusco in Peru.
  11. 23 Sep 2024
    confirmed

    The PNAS survey paper says the two kinds of figures served different purposes

    The small relief figures sit on average 43 m from walking trails and could be seen from them; the giant line figures sit on average 34 m from the network of straight lines and trapezoids. The authors read the first as seen by individuals or small groups, the second as used by the community for ritual.

    T1Sakai et al., PNAS, 23 Sep 2024Abstract; Discussion

Branches

Go down one

A branch is only as strong as its weakest step so far. The count is how many sources back each step.

Branches off main-timeline step 5 · 1968

Landing strips for visitors from space

Were the lines laid out as landing strips or signals for beings arriving from the sky?

Where it came from · 1968

Erich von Däniken’s “Chariots of the Gods?”, first published in German in 1968, which called the Nazca plain an airfield. PBS NOVA summarised it in 1996 as alien craft gouging tracks the Nazcans then preserved. Earlier versions were not checked.

Traction (measured, with the date)
Their strongest arguments, and what the evidence says
  1. The shapes look like an airport

    Von Däniken compared one pattern to a parking bay at a modern airport.

    The premise: likely

    True that it looks like one, PBS NOVA agrees. But it is about 20 feet across, too small to park any ordinary aircraft.

  2. The plain is a long, level strip, like a runway

    Von Däniken describes a strip of level ground some 37 miles long and 1 mile wide.

    The premise: confirmed

    True that it is a flat desert tableland. But its surface is fragile: BBC News reports that even ministers need special footwear to walk there, and that Peru said Greenpeace activists left footprints in 2014.

  3. The figures only make sense seen from high above

    He says the work was senseless unless it was meant for beings approaching from great heights.

    The premise: unverified

    Not for the smaller figures: the 2024 survey found they were placed to be seen from the walking trails. No record read shows the giant figures were meant for anyone in the air.

  4. Ancient people could not have done the work

    He says the task would have taken decades without modern machines.

    The premise: unverified

    No record read measures the labour. The records do show the lines were made by removing surface gravel, by people whose pottery lies on them.

Step by step
  1. confirmed

    Von Däniken’s 1968 book calls the lines landing strips

    He asks what could have made the pre-Inca peoples build “the landing strips, at Nazca”, and says the work would have been senseless unless meant as signs to beings “approaching them from great heights”.

    StartStrength so far:confirmed· 1 source on this step
  2. confirmed

    Nasca-era people made the lines and walked them

    Pottery dates their use from at least the 1st century BCE. The 2024 survey found the small figures could be recognised from the trails, and the giant figures lie a few dozen metres from the network of lines people walked.

    = HoldsStrength so far:confirmed· 2 sources on this step
  3. likely

    The “parking bay” shape is about 20 feet across

    PBS NOVA agreed that one pattern looks like a parking bay at an airport, but measured it as only about 20 feet across, too small for almost any aircraft.

    ▼ WeakerStrength so far:likely· 1 source on this step
  4. unverified

    Key claim: the lines were meant as landing strips or signals for visitors from space

    No tier 1 or 2 record supports it. The records show who made and used the lines, which does not by itself rule out what the makers had in mind, so the step stays Unverified, not Disproven.

    ▼ WeakerStrength so far:unverified· 2 sources on this step
This branch

Bullshit meter

25%1 of 4 steps are Unverified or Disproven · one cell per step
  • Key claim: the lines were meant as landing strips or signals for visitors from space. Unverified.
  • Key claim contradicted by tier 1? Partly. Tier-1 records show Nasca-era people made and used the lines, which contradicts the idea that they could not have. No record tests whether the lines were meant for visitors from the sky, so that part stays Unverified.
This branch

Fluff meter: possibly planted

0 / 5signals present · 3 not measured · not enough to say
  • Can’t be traced to an original record. Absent: traced to the 1968 book.
  • First appeared from new or anonymous accounts. Not measured.
  • Coordinated identical wording. Not measured.
  • Cited source doesn’t exist. Absent: the book exists.
  • Later contradicted. Not measured.

● present · ○ absent · – not measured. Lists signals only. It never accuses anyone.

This branch

Personal interest meter

0documented interests
  • None documented. With no sources attached there is no one to check.

“Has a documented interest” only, each one sourced. Never an implication of guilt.

Case · The Nazca Lines

Correlation meter

2shared items tie parts of this case together

Links to other cases appear once those cases exist.

Community

Who worked on this

Contributors
0
Votes
0
Reviewers
0/2
No contributors yet.

This case was assembled by the site from public records. Contributions are not open yet. Nothing here is invented, so the counts are zero.

No updates yet.

This is the first published version of the case.

Every source on this page

Sources

  • T1Masato Sakai, Akihisa Sakurai, Siyuan Lu, Jorge Olano, Conrad M. Albrecht, Hendrik F. Hamann and Marcus Freitag, “AI-accelerated Nazca survey nearly doubles the number of known figurative geoglyphs and sheds light on their purpose”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (40), e2407652121, published 23 Sep 2024 (Yamagata University and IBM Research). Read in the Europe PMC full text; section names are the paper’s own.. www.pnas.org · copy read: www.ebi.ac.uk
  • T1“Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa”, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, property 700: brief description and Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. Date of inscription: 1994.. whc.unesco.org
  • T1“143 New Geoglyphs Discovered on the Nasca Pampa and Surrounding Area”, Yamagata University news release, 15 Nov 2019 (with IBM Japan). Read in the Wayback Machine copy of 17 Nov 2019.. www.yamagata-u.ac.jp · copy read: web.archive.org
  • T2“Peru: 143 new geoglyphs discovered in Nazca using artificial intelligence”, Andina (Peru’s state news agency), English edition, 19 Nov 2019. andina.pe
  • T3Erich von Däniken, “Chariots of the Gods? Unsolved Mysteries of the Past”, Bantam edition, February 1971 (first published in German by Econ-Verlag, 1968; English translation 1969 by Michael Heron). The claimant’s own book. Read in a scanned copy on the Internet Archive; pages from the book’s index (Nazca, pp. 16–17).. archive.org
  • T2“Von Daniken’s theory: an alien airfield!”, NOVA Online, Hot Science: Alien Evidence, WGBH/PBS, © 1996. www.pbs.org
  • T2“Reicher’s theory: an astronomical calendar!”, NOVA Online, Hot Science: Alien Activity, WGBH/PBS, © 1996 (the page spells Maria Reiche’s name “Reicher”). www.pbs.org
  • T2“Using (and misusing) evidence: scale makes a difference”, NOVA Online, Hot Science: Alien Activity, WGBH/PBS, © 1996. www.pbs.org
  • T2“Greenpeace sorry for Nazca lines stunt in Peru”, BBC News, 11 Dec 2014. www.bbc.com
  • T3“Special Report: Unearthing Nazca”, Gaia, YouTube, published 20 Jun 2017 (the promoter’s own video, as a record of its claim). www.youtube.com
  • T1Boletín UNAM-DGCS-700xc, 13 Sep 2023: the Institute of Physics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico reissues its statement of 12 Sep 2017 on the radiocarbon dating of the Peruvian “mummies” by its LEMA laboratory (in Spanish). www.dgcs.unam.mx
  • T2“1,000-year-old fossils of ‘alien’ corpses displayed in Mexico’s Congress as UFO expert testifies”, Euronews, 13 Sep 2023. www.euronews.com
  • T2“‘Aliens’ found in Peru are actually dolls made of bones, forensic experts declare”, CBS News, 12 Jan 2024 (citing Reuters and the Associated Press). www.cbsnews.com
  • T2“Paranormal America in 2020/21”, Chapman University Survey of American Fears, Wave 7, SSRS Probability Panel, n=1,035, fielded 5–15 Jan 2021, margin of error ±3.9%. blogs.chapman.edu
  • T3“Ancient Aliens: Peru’s Geoglyphs Expose a Mysterious Past (Season 17)”, HISTORY, YouTube, published 12 Aug 2021. www.youtube.com
  • T3“The Alien Secrets of the Nazca Lines | Erich von Däniken”, Erich von Däniken Official, YouTube, published 18 Sep 2025. www.youtube.com
  • T3“Are Tridactyl Mummies Aliens or Something Else?”, JRE Clips (from JRE #2372 with Garry Nolan), YouTube, published 28 Aug 2025. www.youtube.com
  • T3“Mummy mystery: UFO proof or hoax? Ross Coulthart investigates | Reality Check”, NewsNation, YouTube, published 13 Mar 2026. www.youtube.com
  • T3“History’s Greatest Mysteries: Are Peruvian Mummies Connected to the Nazca Lines?! (Season 4)”, HISTORY, YouTube, published 30 Jun 2023. www.youtube.com
  • NO TIEROur own measurement: monthly user page views of English Wikipedia articles from the Wikimedia pageviews API, summed over the 12 months October 2025 to September 2026, read on 17 Oct 2026. Interest in a topic, not belief in a theory. Not a source tier.